Apenas, apenas, apenas
Uma nota acerca do Intelligent Design, essa «teoria científica que surge fundada em si mesmo e não contra o darwinismo». [Palavras de Rogério Matias citadas no Voz do Deserto, o bold é meu].
- Deus Existe e é Grande Como Uma Banana:
Não sei se vale a pena. Mas outra nota, com mais bolds meus:
- [...] «ID is essentially a hoax, however, since evolution is consistent with a belief in an intelligent designer of the universe. The two are not contradictory and they are not necessarily competitors. ID is proposed mainly by Christian apologists at the Discovery Institute and their allies, who feel science threatens their Biblical-based view of reality.» [...] http://skepdic.com/intelligentdesign.html
E outra:
[...] «Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science. These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority, revelation, or religious belief. Documentation offered in support of these claims is typically limited to the special publications of their advocates. These publications do not offer hypotheses subject to change in light of new data, new interpretations, or demonstration of error. This contrasts with science, where any hypothesis or theory always remains subject to the possibility of rejection or modification in the light of new knowledge.» Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences
Eu sei que tinha dito que seria só uma. Paciência, está aqui outra, sem bolds ou sequer a própria nota, mas um bom link:
- 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense - Scientific American
Ah, e evolucionismo e darwinismo não são bem a mesma coisa.
E sim, infelizmente isto dá-me algum gozo.
- Deus Existe e é Grande Como Uma Banana:
Não sei se vale a pena. Mas outra nota, com mais bolds meus:
- [...] «ID is essentially a hoax, however, since evolution is consistent with a belief in an intelligent designer of the universe. The two are not contradictory and they are not necessarily competitors. ID is proposed mainly by Christian apologists at the Discovery Institute and their allies, who feel science threatens their Biblical-based view of reality.» [...] http://skepdic.com/intelligentdesign.html
E outra:
[...] «Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science. These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority, revelation, or religious belief. Documentation offered in support of these claims is typically limited to the special publications of their advocates. These publications do not offer hypotheses subject to change in light of new data, new interpretations, or demonstration of error. This contrasts with science, where any hypothesis or theory always remains subject to the possibility of rejection or modification in the light of new knowledge.» Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences
Eu sei que tinha dito que seria só uma. Paciência, está aqui outra, sem bolds ou sequer a própria nota, mas um bom link:
- 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense - Scientific American
Ah, e evolucionismo e darwinismo não são bem a mesma coisa.
E sim, infelizmente isto dá-me algum gozo.
<< Home